Lay Flat is a wonderful, small-run, independent publication and in case you haven’t heard, issue 2 is out now. Included in this issue:
Lay Flat 02: Meta brings together a selection of contemporary artists whose photographs are conceptually engaged with the history, conventions and materiality of the medium itself. Photographs by Claudia Angelmaier, Semâ Bekirovic, Charles Benton, Walead Beshty, Lucas Blalock, Talia Chetrit, Anne Collier, Natalie Czech, Jessica Eaton, Roe Ethridge, Sam Falls, Stephen Gill, Daniel Gordon, David Haxton, Matt Keegan, Elad Lassry, Katja Mater, Laurel Nakadate, Lisa Oppenheim, Torbjørn Rødland, Noel Rodo-Vankeulen, Joachim Schmid, Penelope Umbrico, Useful Photography, Charlie White, Ann Woo and Mark Wyse are accompanied by the textual contributions of Adam Bell (Co-editor, The Education of a Photographer), Lesley A. Martin (Publisher/Editor, Aperture Foundation), Alex Klein (Editor, Words Without Pictures), artists Noel Rodo-Vankeulen and Arthur Ou, as well a conversation between Lyle Rexer (Author, The Edge of Vision: The Rise of Abstraction in Photography) and James Welling, an artist who is seminal to this dialogue.
Still off on Spring Break, but thought I would put a little something up. La Jetée is a 26 minute short film that has been repeatedly mentioned at school by different teachers and peers as being a must-see. So, here it is:
I have a wee bit of expired film to give away. How much is there you ask?
100 ROLLS of 120 Kodak and Fuji 160 and 400 negative film!!!!
The film has expired but has been refrigerated. It’s now time to send it on to a deserving home.
How to enter:
Send me an email at aphotostudent@yahoo.comwith a link to your website and a really meaty, heartfelt, tear-jerking paragraph or two or three about your favorite photographer, how his/her work has influenced you and what you want to shoot with the film. (no more than 500 word).
I’ll start reading entries when I get back from Spring Break on Saturday March 13th.
Get writing!
Added March 8th: Thank you for all the entries so far. I’m really looking forward to reading them. I’m already happy knowing the film will be loved.
Also added March 8th: Tear-jerking is not necessary and wasn’t really meant seriously (I just read a few submissions and am about to curl up in the fetal position and start crying on my hotel room floor). A nice, thoughtful submission is totally fine. Smile-inducing is great too!
The woman is a young woman. She wants to make a living as a photographer, but at the moment she is temping at a company that publishes books about wetlands preservation. On her days off she takes pictures, and today she is sitting in her car, across the street from a small grocery store called “The Go-Getters Market.” The store is located in a very poor neighborhood of her city—the windows are barred and at night a roll-down steel door covers the storefront. The woman thus finds the name “Go-Getters” an interesting one, because it is clear that the customers of the market are anything but go-getters. They are drunkards and prostitutes and transients, and the young photographer thinks that if she can get the right picture of some of these people entering the store, she will make a picture that would be considered trenchant, or even poignant—either way the product of a sharp and observant eye. So she sits in her Toyota Camry, which her parents gave her because it was two years old and they wanted something new, and she waits for the right poor person to enter or leave the store. She has her window closed, but will open it when the right person appears, and then shoot that person under the sign that says “Go-Getters.” This, for the viewer of her photograph when it is displayed—first in a gallery, then in the hallway of a collector’s home, and later in a museum when she has her retrospective—will prove that she, the photographer, has a good eye for irony and hypocrisy, for the inequities and injustices of life, its perfect and unmitigated absurdity.
Surprise Surprise, another short week this past week. Snow knocked out Tuesday’s History of the Book class.
In Monday’s Digital Imaging class we talked about skin tones. We were advised to work in CMYK and not RGB in the info palette for skin tones so that the info palette would display as percentages and not on a 0-255 scale. To switch to CMYK go to palette options drop down menu in the upper right of the palette.
Here’s a photo of some info from class:
Skintones. Click to view large
In CMYK, yellow should be your highest value followed by magenta and then cyan. The K in CMYK is for black and that value will be determined by whether or not the subject in the photo is black or not. This is just a starting point and then you can tweak as needed.
The plot is set in a day in the life of Thomas (Hemmings), a professional fashion photographer. It begins the day after spending the night at a doss house where he has taken pictures for a book of art photos he hopes to publish. He is late for a photo shoot at his studio with Veruschka, which in turn makes him late for another photo shoot with many other models later in the morning. He grows bored and walks off the shoot (also leaving the models and production staff in the lurch). Exiting the studio, two girls, aspiring teenaged models (Jane Birkin and Gillian Hills), ask to speak with him, but Thomas drives off to look at an antiques shop which he might buy. Wandering into nearby Maryon Park, he sees two lovers and takes photos of them. The woman (Redgrave) is nettled at being photographed, and Thomas is startled when she somehow stalks him back to his studio, asking for the film. This makes him want the film even more, so he misleads her into taking another roll instead. He makes many blowups (enlargements) of the black and white photos. These blowups have very rough film grain but nonetheless seem to show a body lying in the grass and a killer lurking in the trees with a gun. Thomas is frightened by a knock on the door, but it is only the two girls again, with whom he has a romp in his studio and falls asleep. Awakening, he finds they hope he will photograph them then and there, but he tells the girls to leave, saying, “Tomorrow! Come back tomorrow!”
As evening falls, Thomas goes back to the park and indeed finds a body, but he has not brought his camera and is scared off by the sound of a twig breaking, as if being stepped on. At a drug-drenched party in a house on the Thames River near central London, he finds both the French model (who tells him she is in Paris) and his publishing agent (Peter Bowles), the latter whom he wants to bring to the park as a witness. However, Thomas cannot put across in meaningful words what he has photographed. Waking up in the same, now stilled house at sunrise, he goes back to the park alone, but the body is gone.
Befuddled, he watches a mimed tennis match, is drawn into it, picks up their unseen, imaginary ball and throws it back to the two players. While he watches the mimed match, the sound of a ball being played back and forth is soon heard. As the photographer watches this alone on the lawn he fades away, leaving only the green grass as the film ends.
Here is the final mime scene:
In Right Here, Right Now we talked about heterotopias. Read Foucault’s essay about them HERE. We also briefly mentioned Beate Gütschow’s constructed landscapes (read an interview HERE) .
Beate Gütschow
Spring Break is next week. I’m heading out of town to shoot right after classes this week so things might be a little quiet on here. I’ll try and post a few things from the road, but no promises.
The death and resurrection of photography in a digitized world
Untitled #67 (1980). Cindy Sherman
Photography is dead. That news may come as a surprise, since obituaries about art tend to be written about painting. Invented in the 1830s, photo-graphy is still in its infancy as an art form compared to the centuries-old medium of painting. Despite inventions like portable paint tubes and fast-drying acrylic, painting has not undergone the transformations that digitalization is bringing to the medium of photography.
Of course, I’m speaking about the death of film photography. Happy to save on the cost of film and the time taken to develop it, consumers embraced digitalization with such gusto that a whole industry is dying. In 2005, the film photography giant AgfaPhoto filed for bankruptcy. In 2009, Polaroid ceased the production of instant Polaroid film, and Kodak discontinued Kodachrome film. Digital photographs are not only cheaper and faster to produce; they can be stored endlessly and shared instantly with countless friends. Polaroids, though ‘instant’, could not be emailed and tweeted.
Marc is working on exhibitions related to the theme “Photography and Publishing”.
In Marc’s words (with my bold added):
Let me explain the concept of my exhibition. As I am working on the theme of Photography and Publishing, and have seen seen many strong, beautiful, and important book dummies in the past few years at festivals, portfolio reviews, and elsewhere, I have decided to focus on those materials that have not been published: the Exhibition of the Non-Published. Although my starting point is photobook dummies, I am actually interested in all unpublished materials: reportages intended for magazines, slideshows for festivals or websites, art projects, etc. Of course the work that I am looking for has to be of outstanding quality, and its non-publication has to be for a reason other than the quality. The exhibition will consist of several parts: a large collection of book dummies of various shapes and formats, a few selected dummies with a larger presentation of the project including prints and perhaps more versions of the dummy, and a presentation of unpublished photojournalistic / social documentary reportage.
I'm a New York born and based photographer currently pursuing an MFA in Photography at The School of Visual Arts in New York. Please join me on my journey as I get reeducated. Let's begin...